If there is one thing I've learned from my 3 months of experience designing web pages, it's easy to make a website, but not so easy to make a good one. Like most web users, I generally take most website layouts and designs for granted. But now that I know how frustrating it can be to spend hours trying to design a site that looks clean and interesting and that works the way you want it to, I feel I've gained more of an appreciation for the whole process.
But really, what makes a good website vs. a bad website?
The Good
http://www.nsmb.comMaybe not the best, but I like it, a lot actually. The background image, the color scheme, the layout, are all appealing to me. Nothing is too spare, or too cluttered, and everything is done in a tasteful, easy to navigate manner. My head spins thinking about the hours it took to perfect this layout, and it's not even that complicated.
The Bad
http://www.krazykatmusic.comAs much as I love this little gem of a vintage guitar shop, god does their site suck. Aside from the silly font and bland layout and weird animation.... wait, why is this animation still playing on my screen when I open a new window? Good God. Anyway, this is a great example of excess clutter. Tone it down, clean it up a bit, fix the broken links, and for god's sake, lose that wretched animation. Sorry Krazy Kat, you're still my favorite.
The Ugly
http://now.sprint.com/widget/ What the hell is going on? Why are there so many things happening? I honestly feel like this website could be cool if I could just understand what any of it meant. Eggs? Republicans? Democrats? How did I even get here? You would think a huge corporation like Sprint would hire some web designers with a bit more sense than to assault their customers with such an intense barrage of nonsense.